Project A · Fund Reporting Case Study

Project A Fund VII.
Reporting Case Study.

Ten companies, aggregated cash flows, portfolio performance, the Solarisbank Series E, capital-call allocation and LP economics — reported as of 28 August 2026.

Explore performance Prepared byJuma Ngnoubamdjum

Executive snapshot

Fictitious portfolio · Gross performance · EUR

0113.6%

Post-round Gross IRR

+1.6pp
022.59×

Post-round Gross MOIC

+0.20×
03€4.65m

Capital call

100% allocated
042.00×

LP TVPI

Post Series E

The Series E improves both fund-level return measures, while the LP value remains primarily unrealised. The result is attractive — and still dependent on future portfolio liquidity.

01 / Portfolio performance

Ten companies.
One fund view.

Switch between invested cost, realised proceeds and residual value to see how each company contributes to the portfolio — then inspect return quality below.

Portfolio compositionPre Series E · EUR
Total invested capital€84.0mNetflix · 26.9%

Aggregated cash flows

From deployment
to terminal value.

Gross IRR12.0%Gross MOIC2.38×
Capital deployed€84.0m2016–2021
Realised proceeds+€36.7mCash returned
Residual value+€163.3mAt reporting date
Net value bridge+€116.0mAggregated flow
Selected year2026
Invested€0.00m
Realised+€35.0m
Unrealised+€163.3m
Net flow+€198.3m

Performance ranking

Portfolio companies

# / CompanyValue statusGross IRRGross MOIC

02 / Deal impact

A follow-on round
reshapes the view.

Post-money valuation and fully diluted ownership translate the round terms into a new holding value — then flow through to company and fund returns.

Pre-money€1.00bn
+
Primary investment€250m
=
Post-money€1.25bn
×
PA ownership3.80%
=
Holding value€47.5m
Post Series E€47.5m

Project A holding value

Solarisbank IRR15.9%+10.9pp
Solarisbank MOIC2.68×+1.22×
Fund IRR13.6%+1.6pp
Fund MOIC2.59×+0.20×

03 / Capital call

€4.65m called.
Every euro allocated.

The follow-on investment, management fee and fund expenses are allocated pro rata across ten limited partners.

Total capital call€4,650,000100.0%
Series E investment €4.00m · 86.0%Management fee €0.50m · 10.8%Fund expenses €0.15m · 3.2%
Limited partnerShareAllocated capital call
Mark Zuckerberg22%€1,023,000
Warren Buffett15%€697,500
Jeff Bezos12%€558,000
Larry Ellison12%€558,000
Larry Page10%€465,000
F. Bettencourt Meyers9.2%€427,800
Selected answerElon Musk7.8%€362,700
Bill Gates5.9%€274,350
Steve Ballmer4.1%€190,650
Sergey Brin2%€93,000

04 / LP performance

From paid-in capital
to total value.

A transparent bridge from contributions to realised and residual value makes the LP outcome both understandable and auditable.

01Paid-in capital pre round€108.00m
+
02Series E capital call€4.65m
=
03Paid-in capital post€112.65m
Total value€225.50m
Distributions€36.70m
Net residual value€188.80m
DPI
0.33×Distributed / Paid-in
RVPI
1.68×Residual / Paid-in
TVPI
2.00×DPI + RVPI

05 / Methodology

Built to be
followed.

Good reporting does more than surface a number. It makes the logic behind that number easy to inspect, challenge and reproduce.

01Gross IRR+
XIRR (portfolio cash flows, transaction dates)

Annualised return based on the timing of invested capital, realised proceeds and the reporting-date residual value.

02Gross MOIC+
(Realised + Unrealised Value) / Invested Capital

A time-independent value multiple used alongside IRR to separate absolute value creation from investment timing.

03LP Performance+
TVPI = DPI + RVPI

DPI captures distributions over paid-in capital; RVPI captures net residual value over paid-in capital.

04Core assumptions+
Reporting date: 28 Aug 2026

All realised amounts are treated as distributed. No assets or liabilities exist beyond the supplied case tables.

Model conventions

Gross returns · EUR · XIRR timing · Fully diluted ownership · Fictitious portfolio · Reporting date 28 August 2026